Synthetic Turfgrass: A Florida-Friendly Perspective

Is the grass greener on the other side? Let’s look at the facts.

Comparison infographic between Florida-Friendly landscape and synthetic turf landscape, showing environmental impact differences.
Full text of this infographic is below.

Text: Is the grass greener on the other side? A Florida-Friendly perspective

Authors: Don Rainey and Theresa Badurek

A landscape using synthetic turf as compared to a Florida-Friendly landscape using natural turfgrass.

Pros

  • Good for high-traffic areas
  • No regular mowing
  • Consistent appearance year-round
  • No fertilizer required
  • Initial water savings

Cons

  • High surfaces temperatures — up to 100 degrees hotter than natural grass
  • Increased stormwater runoff
  • No support for wildlife
  • Limited lifespan (10-20 years)
  • Ends up in landfills
  • Potential leaching of contaminants
  • Requires weekly washing and cooling
  • Pet waste runoff

Reference

“Synthetic Turfgrass and the Nine Principles of Florida-Friendly Landscaping™” on Ask IFAS. March 2025.

An equal opportunity institution

Also on Gardening Solutions

More from UF/IFAS